DAX HANDBOOK
6.2 Types of filter arguments

If you wish to follow along, you can find PBIX/Excel files at the bottom of the article. 

Authors

Krešimir Ledinski

Krešimir Ledinski

Microsoft certified expert in the field of Business Intelligence. His biggest passions are DAX, M, and data modeling.

Kristian Radoš

Kristian Radoš

Experienced data analyst. Advanced in SQL, PowerApps and M language.

This segmentation somewhat differs from the generally accepted one, but we find it most suitable to explain different types of CALCULATE filter arguments. In case you find any part of our explanation not precise enough, feel free to comment.

CALCULATE accepts 3 types of filter arguments. Those are model modifiers, model filter removers, and tables of supplied new values. It’s important to understand the distinction between the 3 of them because they play separate roles in the CALCULATE evaluation order.

Model Modifiers

Model modifiers change the semantics of the data model for the specified measure. Those changes include activating non-active relationships or setting cross filter directions.

CROSSFILTER and USERELATIONSHIP functions are the most commonly used model modifiers functions.

Model Filter Removers

Functions mostly used to ignore column/table filters are REMOVEFILTERS and ALL. ALL function can also be used as a supplied table function (3rd type of CALCULATE filter argument) if not used as a top level filter function.

  • If ALL is used as ALL(ColumnName) then it acts as a filter remover and has the same effect as REMOVEFILTERS(ColumnName) function.
  • If ALL is used as FILTER(ALL(ColumnName),true) then it acts as a model filter that can produce a different result in certain situations.

When used as filter remover, both ALL and REMOVEFILTERS functions perform in the same manner, meaning they remove columns used as arguments from the filter context.

ALL with column argument vs ALL with table argument

ALL function behaves differently when you supply a whole table as an input as opposed to a column. Let’s explain this with the following example.

AllFactTable = CALCULATE([SalesAmount],ALL(FactSales))
AllCategoryName = CALCULATE([SalesAmount],ALL(DimProduct[CategoryName]))

In the visual below, DimProduct[CategoryName] and DimCustomer[Country] columns are plotted from DimProduct and DimCustomer tables that are connected to the FactSales table through a 1-* relationship.

AllFactTable measure: When we use table reference as a filter argument, we are ignoring all filters coming from that table, but we also ignore all filters coming from other tables linked to that table through a 1-* relationship. This feature is called expanded tables (covered here).

In the picture above we can see that, even though we haven’t removed any column from the DimProduct or DimCustomer, we still ignore all columns coming from these tables, including DimProduct[CategoryName] and DimCustomer[Country].

AllCategoryName measure: This measure is using column reference in the filter argument, meaning it’s not working with the expanded tables version, but instead it ignores only the specified DimProduct[CategoryName] column. If we focus on the Accessories – Australia cell in the visual, we can see that it produces a different result compared to the total Accessories. Which number does it return? Since we only ignored DimProduct[CategoryName] column, the Country filter is still active for the calculation. This cell returns the total SalesAmount of all sales coming from Australia. And if we observe the values for Bikes, we can see that the figures repeat.

This way we can ignore specific columns/tables from active filters before we run CALCULATE expression.

Table of new values

As opposed to ignoring specific column/table filters, this type of filter argument supplies a set of new active values for columns used in the CALCULATE filter argument.

You can supply either single-column or multi-column combinations of filters that are different than the ones applied with the original filter context. Let’s explain this feature with the calculation below.

Blue or Accessories Summarize =
CALCULATE(
    [SalesAmount],
    FILTER(
        SUMMARIZE(
            Sales,
            Sales[Color],
            Sales[CategoryName]
        ),
        Sales[Color] = "Blue"
            || Sales[CategoryName] = "Accessories"
    )
)

This time, instead of ignoring columns prior to calculation, we provide a list (or table) with the values that must further filter the original filter context before the calculation starts. In the example above, we use SUMMARIZE function to create an OR argument for the SalesAmount calculation. The summarized virtual table looks like this:

Those values now become filters that further filter the Sales table, resulting in the values seen in the visual above.

You will use SUMMARIZE function quite often when you will need to provide a modified lists of values that will futher filter the original filter context. SUMMARIZE is also often used to create a table over which you want to create row 2 filter context transition. This topic will be covered in the following article.

Difference Between Modifiers and Filter/Remove Arguments

Besides the obvious differences in their use cases, it is important to acknowledge that modifiers always have precedence before table filter arguments. This makes sense because you always want to modify the data model (e.g. activate a specific relationship using the USERELATIONSHIP function) before applying any other data model filter argument.

Materials

We wish to create the best possible content!

If you are a novice looking for a better explanation of any element of the topic, feel free to comment on the part you didn't quite understand!

If you are an expert in DAX and believe certain topic lacks important internals, your comments are more than welcomed!

COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

OUR SERVICES

Prefer live training or consultations?

Table of Content

Table of Content

GET LATEST BI NEWS TO YOUR INBOX

Receive the latest updates on all business analyst news across all platforms.

By subscribing you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy.

Related blog posts

Newborn Names – A Growing Pool

As the range of consumer choices has expanded over the past 30 years, so has the range of names parents choose for their children. Name Diversity According to data from Republic of Slovenia Statistical office in 1999 there were 187 different female and 190 different male newborn names. By 2024,...

Read more

Newborn Names – Getting Shorter

If it feels like newborn names are getting shorter, you are not imagining it. Past Trending Data from the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia show that in 1992 the average name length was 5.2 letters for girls and 4.9 letters for boys. By the early 2020s, the average...

Read more

Newborn Names – Changing Popularity Over Time

As with most things in life, the names parents give their children change over time. Names for Girls According to data from Republic of Slovenia Statistical office Eva is the most common name given to newborn girls in the period 1992–2024. It was especially popular in the 2000s, ranking third,...

Read more

We have expanded our team again!

We are extremely pleased to announce that Luka has joined our team, with over 20 years of experience in data, analytics and business decision-making. He built his career in leading international companies such as Procter & Gamble, Nielsen and L’Oréal, where he gained strong analytical thinking, a strategic approach and...

Read more
3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Scroll to Top